TheLawOfAttractionTeacher.com   
Awakening You to Your Spiritual Power!  
    


 
 
   



Response to "The Hubris of The Secret"

by Charlie Curtis

This article, by Valerie Reiss, shows what pretzels people twist themselves into, trying to pretend to themselves and others that metaphysics isn't true. This woman will be in for a big shock when she awakens to the knowledge that the concepts in the Secret are all true, and it all works,

For all the time that she has lived in her carefully constructed skepticism, all around her, and most likely even at that ashram she spent time with, were and are people who are living in the wonderful reality that she is taking such pains to pretend isn't true.

It's fascinating to me to see how people find "proof" for what they believe. In almost every article criticizing the Secret, including this one, the author totally fails to realize that the Secret is filled throughout with a metaphysical message based on thousands of years of metaphysical experience, and that the people interviewed and quoted in the Secret are people of tremendous depth, profound healers like Beckwith, some of the world's best motivators like Waitley, and historical figures who were wedded to the profoundest understandings that have ever been taught, like Troward, Behrend, and Haanel, all of which is just the opposite of the materialistic projection she needs to paste on them in order to justify her walking away from the truth they have to tell.

If you analyze such articles as the projection they are, and then ask yourself - when people project their faults onto others, that which they criticize is really their own unhealed issue, so therefore what is the unhealed issue this writer has which she is accusing these great metaphysicians of having.

And the answer is materialism. In being out of touch with the great metaphysical energies which keep this universe in harmony, she is out of touch with the true nature of life, and thus, all the time she is thinking she is deep, she really has a shallow point of view, and thus is guilty of the very materialism she is condemning.

For to be materialistic is to give material the power and allegiance, instead of to the deeper underlying divine mystery, of which the Secret is just one of many expressions.

In fact, that Secret is, in part, the knowledge that everything is divine, that there is, in fact, no materialism, for there is no place where God is not. That just as God is in the love of one person to another (something this writer is willing to acknowledge) God is also in all so-called material things (something this writer would vehemently deny).

In fact, a robust metaphysics teaches that God is not only IN the so-called material things, God IS the so-called material things, for when we step back, leave our anthropomorphic concepts of God behind, pop the bubble of the Trance of Scarcity, and realize that God is not a being-that-is- not-us, God is an intelligent energy, the Field if you will, within which we live, move, and have our being, then we are free to perceive the God-ness in everything including things like BMWs.

And yet. When "metaphysician" Joe Vitale says in the film that the Universe is like "a catalog" that we can flip through and shop, my stomach churns.

And that is what Joe Vitale understands that she does not. That God is not only in every thought, but in every thing formed from thought, and it was his knowledge of that that attracted his BMW and other so-called material things to him, that she is skewering him for.

For it is that absolute knowledge of the creative power of thought that attracts anything to any metaphysician. The falseness she accuses Vitale of having, is really in her own vision, her own false perception that things like BMWs are crass and not worthy of attention.

When Lisa Nichols says at the film's end that, "It'snot your job to make the world a better place," I want to sit her down for a good long chat with Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and Martin Luther King, Jr.

Like many stuck in materialism and the trance that-there-is-not-enough, she also has a profound lack of joy, and that keeps her from realizing that a sense of playfulness is the closest thing to the Divine essence that we can achieve. And that those teaching a playful attitude towards life are the closest to God awareness, which are of course our children, until we train the joy out of them.

Those who condemn the Godness of playfulness are uniformly angry and podium-pounding in their righteousness, and this writer is no exception. and she really has a terrible time when it comes to acknowledging the power of thought in her own health. She's willing to acknowledge the mind/body interface, which is more than many, but she stops well short of the amazing power our minds have to heal, which is obvious from the following quote.

And when the weirdly out-of-it looking woman says she cured her breast cancer in three months with affirmations and funny movies, I want to hit the TV for all the false, dangerous hope it's transmitting.

It is only a severely joyless person who would attempt to take hope away from someone seeking to improve their health. Hope is the greatest healer, and so therefore it is incredible to watch our health care system in action, as it systematically seeks to strip the hope away from people, painstakingly installing a belief in the worst possible outcome.

Abraham, when asked the cause of cancer, said it is the unhealed thought, day after day, that finally takes root as a condition in the body, as the cause of every disease.

""The Secret" feels like white rice to me—stripped of its nutritionfor maximum palatability and fluffy appeal."

Stripped of nutrition for maximum palatability? Fluffy appeal? The white rice she speaks of is the health care system and other godless expressions of hopelessness and fear in our culture, those bastions of negative thought which teach us that we have to be survivors.

For fluffy appeal, try the television ads for health care institutions, which promise "come to our cancer center because we care" while the violins play in the background, but once you get there you find that the only people having fun were the actors in the ad, for when you walk through the doors, you find a population of freaked-out patients, full of fear and misery, dreading the next day's regimen of burning, cutting and poisoning,

And the fluffy appeal runs out of romantic momentum really fast as you lose both your lunch and your hair, and the hopelessness of materialism really kicks in when the insurance claim is then denied.

But the good thing to know is that she, like everyone else, is here for her soul's journey, and that as she takes one step after another towards the light, one day she will contemplate the possibility of what up until now she has denied. and one day she too will join the ranks of those who learn to see the Godness in every created thing,

And in that day she will no longer condemn wealth, the healing power of thought, and the value of living in a playful spirit of abundance, for she too will realize that the God-Power that runs this universe will create for her whatever she desires because of its incredible love for her, and since it also loves each created thing in this same way, all of us have access to this same abundance in every moment, so there is no lack for anyone in any moment.

For when we learn to see the flame of love burning in every heart and the sacred nature of every thing, and the sacred nature of every moment, then we learn not to condemn, for we learn that the very act of judgment, of condemnation, that is the one error we can commit.

In other words, she never learned the fundamental truth of the Buddha she purports to understand, and that is, in freedom from the bondage of judgmental thought is the Peace she seeks but does not find.

Because in any act of condemning, we are denying God, for we are seeing not-God, but instead the material. We are seeing a perfect world through the eyes of the separated self, and finding fault with it. But the fault we see is the projection of the fault within ourselves, and this fault is one of perception, it is the hell of separation from the God-Self, created through divisive thought..

And her article, like so many others like it, in its holier-than-thou condemnation, commits the very sin it purports to heal - it sees life through material eyes instead of seeing through the eyes of the God-self that each of us, at our core, already is.

For she, like every one of us, is a pure and perfect expression of the I AM. And as she labors mightily to deny her divinity within, what has she accomplished of value?

But then, as Abraham says, we never get it wrong, for we never get it done.

And so as she sincerely moves one step closer to truth, by attempting to clarify her thinking, she moves one halting step forwards towards the enlightenment she seeks, which is a conscious experience of the God within her, and the knowledge that the Peace she has been looking for for years is closer to her than her very breath, for it moves in, through, and as her very Being 24/7, 365 days a year, for it is her very life.

 

The Hubris of 'The Secret'

“As a cancer survivor I'm not sure I buy the 'create your ownreality' stuff in 'The Secret.' And if it's true, what about God?”
By Valerie Reiss

When I was diagnosed with cancer a few years ago, I was afraid to tell my New-Agey friends and acquaintances. Mainly, I was afraid they would say, "Why did you do that to yourself?" Not out of cruelty, but from a genuine desire to help me see how I had "created my own reality," a central tenet of New Age thinking. Thankfully, no one said any such thing. (Though one woman did ask if perhaps I should have just ingested a lot of wheatgrass instead of having chemotherapy.)

This choose-your-own-adventure thinking has caught fire recentlywith the wild success of "The Secret" book and DVD by Australian TV producer Rhonda Byrne. There are already 400,000 copies of the book in print and Simon & Schuster just announced they're printing two million more, which is what happens when Oprah champions your book in two separate shows and says this is how she's lived her own life for years.

The book and the documentary-ish film are essentially the same: a compendium of talking heads—philosophers, life coaches, and authors— all talking about how the essence of our thoughts affects, nay, creates, the world around us through the power of quantum physics, energy, and our interconnectedness. It's similar in a lot of ways to "What the Bleep Do We Know," but without the narrative Marlee Matlin part.

Except this time the production values are better—everything looks very luxe and DaVinci-code-esque—and the heads are all hitting the same point home over and over: If you "align" yourself by feeling good, the Universe (New Age-speak for God) will provide limitless abundance. This is illustrated in numerous dramatizations: a woman wraps her thoughts around a necklace in a window, pretty soon it appears around her neck; a gay man who's harassed for his homosexuality starts practicing the secret and soon finds people are offering him new respect.

The "secret" is kind of like prayer on steroids: Instead of apersonal God processing and granting requests, a web of energysimply bounces your mindset back at you in material form. As one of the teachers in the film, Mike Dooley, sums it up, "Thoughts become things.

"I first encountered the "secret" about 13 years ago when it was much less sexily called "The Law of Attraction" or "Intentional Reality" by many, many authors and alternative spirituality teachers, from Esther and Jerry Hicks to Wayne Dyer to Deepak Chopra. Living at a yoga ashram the summer between sophomore and junior year of college, two friends and I were walking through the woods. City girl that I was, I carried a stick, hoping to fend off dangerous animals or deranged woodsmen.

My curly-haired friend Scott looked at the stick and shook hishead, "What you resist persists," he said, very much the 22-year-old sage. He explained that what we fear, we "magnetize" and manifest in our lives. So by holding the stick as defensive weapon, I was actually putting us in unnecessary peril. I reluctantly let it go. And proceeded to head-trip myself on and off for years about my negative thoughts, which were abundant.

I would realize I was thinking negative thoughts, which wouldtrigger more thoughts about how awful I was for thinking negative thoughts and how I was ruining my life with those thoughts, and so on and so on, until my head was ready to explode with all the bad juju. The only thing that freed me from that loop was something else I also learned that summer at the ashram, meditation.

The teaching that inside of us is a "witness" who is not ourthoughts, not our body, but just a still, silent observer, soothed me. I could find that perspective when I quieted down and simply did as I was told: watched the thoughts roll by like unimportant clouds— not clinging no matter how great or terrible they seemed, just watching. Buddhism also teaches this, of course, non-attachment to thoughts good or bad; in one of many out-of-context quotes whispered sotto voce throughout the film, "The Secret" cites Buddha as saying "All that we are is a result of what we have thought" to back- up its claims.

The secret, a.k.a. law of attraction (LOA), works, goes the theory, because our bodies and thoughts are made up of the same vibrating matter as the air, the trees, and God. According to a segment of quantum physics, each thought has a vibration that the Universe can somehow respond to, and each thought, especially those charged with emotion, helps to manifest every experience, person, or object in our lives. And, the LOA-teachers say, we can use this knowledge to create lives we want and intend. It's supposed to be empowering. It supposed to point out how we've been unconscious victims of our own undirected intentions and allow us to become victims no more.

To some this seems laughable, like the Tooth Fairy or Ouija boards. To others it's downright offensive—where does God fit into this DIY existence? Fate? Karma? Destiny? Are those disposable as paper plates? And what, of course, about genocide? Did Anne Frank just not "align her desires with the Universe" well enough? Were Rwandans' thoughts too focused on what they didn't want ("Don't slaughter my family") instead of what they did want ("Give me peace")?

Rhonda Byrne actually addresses this seemingly gaping lack ofcompassion in a recent Newsweek article: "`The law of attraction is that each one of us is determining the frequency that we're on by what we're thinking and feeling,' Byrne said in a telephone interview, in response to a question about the massacre in Rwanda. `If we are in fear, if we're feeling in our lives that we're victims and feeling powerless, then we are on a frequency of attracting those things to us ... totally unconsciously, totally innocently, totally all of those words that are so important.'"

It's difficult, when you follow this line of thinking to this ultimately icky conclusion, to not feel sort of gross about wishing yourself a new plasma TV. And yet. This is hard. But what. If. It's. True? What if Darfur is getting worse because we're focusing energy on stopping the violence instead of emitting requests for peace? What if we do end up electing presidents we don't want because they're the ones everyone's thinking about, as one man says in "The Secret"? What if, nothing personal, I did create my own cancer by being afraid of cancer? Then what?

I don't even want to ask these questions, but if we're going to be buying into this law of attraction stuff, we must take a legitimate look at its ugliest parts, in the same way that if you're going to eat meat you should be willing to spend a day at a slaughterhouse.

I'm of two minds on law of attraction. Of course, like any good American, Horatio Alger-championing, magic-loving, wannabe-mystic control freak, the warm fuzzy you-can-do-it-by-wishing parts of the secret are delicious, delectable, enticing things—I can "manifest" my dream home without working more? Cool. I can wish myself to stay well without more self-care? Cooler.

I've experienced a taste of this before, putting lots of intentional thoughts out into the Universe and having them come back quickly, as surprise goodies, just like James Redfield said they would in "The Celestine Prophecy." I've had amazing coincidences all over the world, thinking about people minutes before running into them. I believe in the power of positive thinking, and I believe that once we are clear in ourselves, aligned with our purpose, and going toward our dreams, magic can and does happen, miracles do occur.

And I also think we are connected to each other and God and nature more than we know, and that our minds hold huge reserves of untapped potential. I even buy the part about "anti-war" movements being less successful than "peace" movements, and that the war on drugs and terror only gets us more of what we're fighting against.

And yet. When "metaphysician" Joe Vitale says in the film that the Universe is like "a catalog" that we can flip through and shop, my stomach churns. When Lisa Nichols says at the film's end that, "It's not your job to make the world a better place," I want tosit her down for a good long chat with Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and Martin Luther King, Jr. And when the weirdly out-of-it looking woman says she cured her breast cancer in three months with affirmations and funny movies, I want to hit the TV for all the false, dangerous hope it's transmitting.

When I had cancer (and I carefully choose the past tense though the doctors never will, no matter healthy I am, because I want to send my body a happy message), I made sure to lower my stress levels, think nice thoughts, listen to an affirming CD, and ask my friends and family to pray for me. The mind-body connection is real to me. My thoughts may or may not affect the Universe, but I know they affect my body; I have willed warts away, calmed myself when fearful, visualized love pouring into me and felt a shift. Energy is real to me too.

I'm just not so convinced that a woman peddling borrowed ideas (and that's the generous word for how Byrne has ransacked the work of people like Esther and Jerry Hicks, authors of "The Law of Attraction" and other books) about wishing ourselves fabulous is for real. If it gets people thinking more positively, great. If it gets people clear and making strides to do good things for themselves, even better. I'm just patently suspicious of something that's a) so slickly marketed and obviously co-opted and b) is supposed to be about feeling good yet doesn't mention the word compassion or seem to take seriously the idea of harnessing this great law (if that's what it is) to help others.

In other books on LOA, the materialism isn't quite so bald, the hubris and lack of humility much less egregious. But no one to my satisfaction addresses the blame-the-victim issue at the slippery heart of this; in a culture that's already not too fond of "losers," do we really need another reason to disdain or pity those who suffer because they're not "manifesting" the right reality? In a culture that already likes to look away from systemic political and economic oppression (bo-ring!), do we need another excuse to walk away from it all and say, "not my problem"?

"The Secret" feels like white rice to me—stripped of its nutrition for maximum palatability and fluffy appeal. And I'm all for fluff, with the Entertainment Weekly subscription to prove it. But not when it comes to something as serious as creating genuine joy and peace. That should be sacred—done with a combination of faith in a force that knows better than I do and compassionate free will to make my life and the world a better place. Manifest that, Universe.

www.beliefnet.com/story/213/story_21359.html